Against Bioethics

Meer over het boek

Governments, health professionals, patients, research institutions, and subjects often seek guidance from bioethicists on medical treatment and research decisions. However, Jonathan Baron argues that applied bioethics lacks a coherent guiding theory and relies heavily on intuitive judgments. He proposes an alternative framework based on utilitarianism and decision analysis. Utilitarianism posits that the best option maximizes expected good, while decision analysis helps evaluate risks and trade-offs of specific choices. This approach, akin to economics, uses data to predict outcomes in complex situations and directs human judgment toward consequential issues. With a solid theoretical foundation, bioethics could avoid decisions that contradict the expected good of those affected. Baron explores various bioethical issues that could benefit from this analysis, such as genetic enhancements, reproduction, end-of-life concerns (including advance directives, euthanasia, and organ donation), coercion and consent, conflicts of interest, and drug research. While critical of current bioethical practices, Baron believes that integrating utilitarianism and decision analysis could enable bioethics to provide authoritative guidance in addressing challenging medical and ethical dilemmas.