Thomas Szasz Boeken

The book explores the intertwining of medicine and politics in contemporary America, highlighting how behaviors once viewed through moral lenses are now categorized as health issues. It critiques the shift from legal accountability to medical discretion, suggesting that this transformation fosters a system termed "pharmacracy" by social critic Thomas Szasz. The author delves into the implications of this trend, questioning the societal impact of redefining human problems as medical conditions and the consequences of treating judicial matters as health treatments.

In this polemical response to the controversy about drug use and drug criminalization, Thomas Szasz suggests that governments have overstepped their bounds in labelling and prohibiting certain drugs as dangerous substances and incarcerating addicts in order to cure them. schovat popis

Challenging conventional psychiatric doctrines, this book critiques how insanity is defined by science and society. The author argues that insanity cannot be objectively identified, presenting a nuanced view that differentiates it from social deviance, bodily illness, and the sick role. By emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between true biological conditions and societal perceptions, the work aims to reshape the understanding of psychiatric issues. This critical examination is poised to become a significant contribution to the field of behavioral science.

The book presents a compelling argument for the individual's right to choose voluntary death, challenging the legal restrictions that deny this freedom. Thomas Szasz critiques the psychiatric institution's coercive practices, asserting that society's refusal to recognize this choice undermines fundamental liberties. He highlights the inhumane treatment that can arise from such restrictions, advocating for a more compassionate and respectful approach to personal autonomy in matters of life and death.

Dealing with the relationship between psychiatry and the law, this book looks at the federal and state procedures which render impotent the constitutional right to a speedy and public trial. Trial transcripts are used to support the author's arguments.

Every age, labels others to a particular fate, such as the witch consigned to the fire. The priest has now been replaced by the psychiatrist and this text examines the role of medicine as a more insidious tyrant than religion, as it claims to be beneficial to both the patient and the commonwealth.

Karl Kraus was an Austrian writer and satirist who wrote on the abuse of language by psychiatrists, psychoanalysts and journalists. This is an introduction to Kraus's life and work and his place in cultural history, followed by translations of his selected works on psychiatry.

Schizophrenia: The Sacred Symbol of Psychiatry examines the concept of schizophrenia and the origins of its classification as a disease. Szasz convincing argues that rather than a medical diagnosis, the word schizophrenia is a symbol employed by psychiatrists as a means of control.

Challenging the conventional analysis of the mind, Szasz argues for understanding individuals as moral agents responsible for their actions rather than victims of brain chemistry. He critiques the psychiatric field's misinterpretation of human conflict and coping mechanisms, which he previously addressed in his earlier works. This ambitious book warns against reducing the complexities of consciousness and the mind to mere neuroscience, emphasizing the importance of personal responsibility in the discourse surrounding mental health.

This book is a collection of the earliest essays of Thomas Szasz, in which he staked out his position on “the nature, scope, methods, and values of psychiatry.” On each of these issues, he opposed the official position of the psychiatric profession. Where conventional psychiatrists saw themselves diagnosing and treating mental illness, Szasz saw them stigmatizing and controlling persons; where they saw hospitals, Szasz saw prisons; where they saw courageous professional advocacy of individualism and freedom, Szasz saw craven support of collectivism and oppression.