Focusing on the jurisprudence of Justice George Sutherland, this book aims to revive the concept of natural rights for contemporary readers. While Sutherland is often criticized and overshadowed in historical discussions, his contributions to voting rights for women and his complex legacy are highlighted. Both liberal and conservative jurists reference his writings, with liberals valuing his protection of privacy rights and conservatives appreciating his economic freedom advocacy. This work seeks to recontextualize Sutherland's significance in today's legal landscape.
The book explores how the concept of a 'right to abortion' has influenced American political thought, diverging from the Founders' principles of natural rights. Hadley Arkes critically examines the implications of this shift, arguing that it alters the foundational understanding of rights in the political landscape. Through this analysis, the author engages with broader themes of morality, law, and the philosophical underpinnings of American democracy.
By re-evaluating longstanding legal cases and concepts, the author uncovers ambiguities and complexities that challenge widely accepted interpretations. This exploration prompts readers to reconsider the foundations of legal understanding, revealing that many established notions may not be as definitive as they seem. The book invites a deeper inquiry into the intricacies of law and its evolving nature.
The author delves into well-established legal cases and concepts, uncovering ambiguities and complexities that challenge conventional understandings. By critically analyzing these legal precedents, the book invites readers to reconsider the implications and interpretations that have shaped the law, revealing a more nuanced landscape of legal thought.
Originalism and the Anchoring Truths of the Constitution
352bladzijden
13 uur lezen
Challenging legal relativism and originalism, Hadley Arkes emphasizes the timeless moral principles embedded in the U.S. Constitution, rooted in the human condition. He argues that revitalizing these principles is essential for overcoming national dysfunction and achieving societal stability. Arkes, influenced by Leo Strauss, advocates for a return to the foundational ideals of the Founders, suggesting that their insights can guide contemporary life and governance.
Focusing on the intersection of morality and law, the author addresses contentious urban issues such as the political implications of public spaces, hate speech, and the boundaries of free expression. The discussion extends to segregation, busing, and racial quotas, as well as challenges related to education and housing in ghettos. Additionally, the book examines the regulation of vices like prostitution and gambling, providing a comprehensive analysis of how these factors shape urban life and societal norms.
The book examines the transformation of the Marshall Plan from its initial conception of blending national interest and generosity into its bureaucratic execution. Hadley Arkes analyzes how the intentions of its creators evolved during implementation, providing insight into the complexities of defining and executing foreign policy. Through this exploration, the study highlights the interplay between idealism and pragmatism in shaping international relations.
Je klamstvo vždy nesprávne? Alebo existujú prípady, v ktorých je klamstvo dovolené? Ako by ste odpovedali nacistovi, ktorý sa vás pri dverách pýta, či ukrývate Židov? Vo februári 2011 americká mládežnícka pro-life organizácia Live Action uverejnila na internete videá, v ktorých jej aktivisti prezlečení za pasákov a prostitútky získavajú informácie o možnosti získania antikoncepcie, potratov a lekárskej starostlivosti od pracovníkov rôznych pobočiek štátom spolufinancovanej organizácie Planned Parenthood, venujúcej sa práve týmto činnostiam. Ústretovosť a ochota niektorých zamestnancov Planned Parenthood voči údajným prostitútkam, niektorým dokonca mladistvým, vyvolala v Spojených štátoch škandál vedúci až k hlasovaniu o zastavení štátneho financovania tejto inštitúcie v dolnej komore amerického parlamentu. V hnutí za život videá Live Action vyvolali búrlivú diskusiu o morálnosti jej praktík a vôbec o morálnosti klamstva na záchranu života. Táto kniha prináša časť diskusie, ktorá prebehla na americkom diskusnom portáli Public Discourse, doplnenú o teologickú a filozofickú argumentáciu i historické príklady ilustrujúce túto závažnú otázku.
