Bookbot

The Secular Conscience

Why Belief Belongs in Public Life

Parameters

  • 269bladzijden
  • 10 uur lezen

Meer over het boek

From Washington to the Vatican to Tehran, religion is increasingly a public concern, with secular values like individual autonomy, pluralism, and freedom of conscience under siege. The religious assert a monopoly on morality, while secular liberals are criticized for lacking a clear moral stance. Many secular liberals have abandoned their moral authority, viewing issues of conscience—religion, ethics, and values—as private matters unsuitable for public discourse. This mindset prevents them from critically examining religion's impact on individual rights and advocating their moral perspectives for fear of imposing beliefs on others. Philosopher Austin Dacey calls for a reevaluation of conscience's role in public life, drawing inspiration from earlier liberal thinkers like Spinoza and John Stuart Mill. He urges liberals to break their silence and champion a renewed secularism rooted in the objective moral value of conscience. Dacey likens conscience to the press, asserting that it must be protected from coercion and control, not due to its privacy but because of its essential public function. Conscience should precede all faiths, guiding belief and providing a common language for meaningful dialogue in a diverse society, serving as an ethical framework for global discussions.

Uitgave

Een boek kopen

The Secular Conscience, Austin Dacey

Taal
Jaar van publicatie
2008
product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
(Hardcover),
Staat van het boek
Beschadigd
Prijs
€ 8,82

Betaalmethoden

Nog niemand heeft beoordeeld.Tarief

Titel
The Secular Conscience
Ondertitel
Why Belief Belongs in Public Life
Taal
Engels
Jaar van publicatie
2008
Formaat
Hardcover
Aantal pagina's
269
ISBN10
1591026040
ISBN13
9781591026044
Reeks
Aantekening
From Washington to the Vatican to Tehran, religion is increasingly a public concern, with secular values like individual autonomy, pluralism, and freedom of conscience under siege. The religious assert a monopoly on morality, while secular liberals are criticized for lacking a clear moral stance. Many secular liberals have abandoned their moral authority, viewing issues of conscience—religion, ethics, and values—as private matters unsuitable for public discourse. This mindset prevents them from critically examining religion's impact on individual rights and advocating their moral perspectives for fear of imposing beliefs on others. Philosopher Austin Dacey calls for a reevaluation of conscience's role in public life, drawing inspiration from earlier liberal thinkers like Spinoza and John Stuart Mill. He urges liberals to break their silence and champion a renewed secularism rooted in the objective moral value of conscience. Dacey likens conscience to the press, asserting that it must be protected from coercion and control, not due to its privacy but because of its essential public function. Conscience should precede all faiths, guiding belief and providing a common language for meaningful dialogue in a diverse society, serving as an ethical framework for global discussions.