Daniel A. Dombrowski Boeken

This work delves into the neoclassical interpretation of Plato's philosophy, particularly focusing on his views regarding the divine. It examines how Plato's ideas on God have been reinterpreted through a neoclassical lens, highlighting the philosophical implications and the evolution of these concepts over time. The text offers insights into the intersection of Platonic thought and theological discourse, providing a nuanced understanding of Plato's influence on subsequent philosophical and religious thought.

The book presents a robust defense of the ontological argument, addressing and countering contemporary critiques. Daniel A. Dombrowski engages with philosophical challenges, aiming to reaffirm the validity and relevance of this classical argument for the existence of God. Through rigorous analysis, the author seeks to clarify misunderstandings and strengthen the argument's position in modern philosophical discourse.

The book presents a defense of the ontological argument by employing a neoclassical or process concept of God, challenging contemporary philosophical critiques. Daniel A. Dombrowski draws on Charles Hartshorne's distinction between divine existence and divine actuality to fortify the argument, allowing for a more dynamic understanding of God. This approach addresses the traditional criticisms that arise from a static view of divinity, thereby enhancing the relevance of theistic metaphysics in modern philosophical discourse.

The book explores the concept of God as presented in the works of Nikos Kazantzakis, suggesting that his views align with process theism. It delves into Kazantzakis's philosophical and theological insights, examining how his writings reflect a dynamic, evolving understanding of the divine. Through this analysis, the author seeks to illuminate Kazantzakis's unique perspective on spirituality and existence, contributing to broader discussions in theology and philosophy.

The exploration of John Rawls's political philosophy reveals a profound engagement with the intersection of politics and religion, challenging the assumption of his disinterest in the topic. Daniel A. Dombrowski argues that this relationship is central to liberalism's enduring dilemmas. The book delves into contentious issues such as abortion, the rise of fundamentalism, and the decline of secular culture, using Rawls's insights to navigate these complex themes and their implications for contemporary society.

Expanding on Seybold's pioneering 1951 analysis of Thoreau's classicism, this book argues that Thoreau was a Platonist. Viewing Thoreau as a Platonist deepens our understanding of, and removes alleged contradictions in, his theism, his vegetarianism, and the function of language in his thought.