Jerry Bergman Volgorde van de boeken

Exploring the coexistence of life forms, this book addresses the challenging question of why God created harmful entities like viruses and pathogens. The authors argue that most bacteria and insects are beneficial, and they delve into the reasons some pathogens cause harm. They also discuss the essential role of toxic chemicals at safe levels. Supported by extensive research from peer-reviewed sources, Bergman and Hoff provide scholarly insights that clarify misconceptions about parasites, toxins, and their place in God's design.

Focusing on the lesser-explored aspect of racism in education, the book delves into the Scopes Trial, highlighting how the text used by Scopes reinforced racial oppression. Bryan's opposition stemmed not from a general aversion to evolution, but from concerns about its implications for human evolution and social hierarchy. He argued that Darwin's ideas justified the "survival of the fittest" mentality, which he linked to the ideologies that fueled World War I. Additionally, Bryan championed local control over educational content in Tennessee.

It is commonly assumed that C S Lewis was a theistic evolutionist. In fact, he was one of the most effective anti-evolutionist of the last century. He did not make his case against evolution from biology, but rather from logic, reason, and history. This book is another reason to appreciate the life and work of Lewis and his contribution to Christian thought.

Exploring the multifaceted causes of the Holocaust, this study highlights the significant roles played by Darwinism, Eugenics, and the Military Industrial Complex, as noted by Dwight Eisenhower. It emphasizes that the Holocaust's execution relied heavily on support from both German and American industries, implicating major corporations like Ford and IBM. By examining the involvement of academia and industry, the work aims to foster a deeper understanding of the factors that contributed to this atrocity, emphasizing the importance of learning from history to prevent future horrors.

The book explores the critical distinction between fact and speculation in paleontology, highlighting how scientists and media sometimes blur this line. It critiques the tendency of paleontologists to propose theories that may be intriguing but are often unsupported or contradicted by existing evidence. Through this examination, it aims to foster a more rigorous understanding of scientific claims in the field, emphasizing the importance of evidence-based conclusions.