Andrew J. Bacevich is een vooraanstaand auteur en professor wiens geschriften zich verdiepen in de complexiteit van het Amerikaanse buitenlandse beleid en militarisme. Voortbouwend op uitgebreide ervaring uit militaire dienst en de academische wereld, biedt hij indringende inzichten in de geschiedenis en de huidige staat van de Amerikaanse macht wereldwijd. Zijn analyses worden gekenmerkt door een diepe historische context en een kritische evaluatie van langetermijntrends die de rol van Amerika op het wereldtoneel vormen. Lezers zullen zijn vermogen waarderen om militaire geschiedenis te verbinden met politieke realiteiten en de wortels van het Amerikaanse buitenlandse beleid te onthullen.
[Andrew J.] Bacevich is thought-provoking, profane and fearless. . . . [His] call for Americans to rethink their nation's militarized approach to the Middle East is incisive, urgent and essential. - The New York Times Book Review Bacevich's magnum opus . . . a deft and rhythmic polemic aimed at... číst celé
American veterans who fought in Iraq and Afghanistan offer invaluable firsthand perspectives on what made America's post-9/11 wars so costly and disastrous.
Tough-minded, bracing, and intelligent, Andrew J. Bacevich presents a compelling challenge to the prevailing belief that American security hinges on a permanent military presence worldwide. Hailed as "brilliant," he critiques the bipartisan consensus that has dominated U.S. foreign policy for decades, arguing it has outlived its relevance. With sharp analysis, Bacevich dismantles the assumptions that underpin this faith in military power, particularly the idea that overwhelming strength will ensure compliance with U.S. interests, whether for resources or economic gain. He advocates for a reevaluation of the principles guiding American policy, emphasizing that domestic issues, such as revitalizing Detroit, should take precedence over foreign military engagements like Afghanistan. As America faces the consequences of its militaristic approach—both unaffordable and perilous—Bacevich insists that replacing the entrenched Washington consensus is vital for the nation's future and could be key to its salvation.
International relations expert Andrew Bacevich reconsiders the assumptions and purposes governing the exercise of American global power. He finds that successive post-Cold War administrations have adhered to a well-defined "strategy of openness." Motivated by the imperative of economic expansionism, that strategy aims to foster an open and integrated international order, thereby perpetuating the undisputed primacy of the world's sole remaining superpower. Moreover, openness has been an abiding preoccupation of policymakers as far back as Woodrow Wilson. Although based on expectations that eliminating barriers to the movement of trade, capital, and ideas nurtures not only affluence but also democracy, the aggressive pursuit of openness has met considerable resistance. To overcome that resistance, U.S. policymakers have with increasing frequency resorted to force, resulting in the progressive militarization of U.S. foreign policy. Bacevich maintains that this drive for openness is in fact aimed at erecting a global imperium.--From publisher description
Focusing on America's post-9/11 identity, Andrew Bacevich's collection of essays explores the profound impact of the events of September 2001 on U.S. culture and politics. Through critical analysis, he delves into the nation's response to these events, revealing how they have reshaped American self-perception and its role globally. The work stands as a significant commentary on war and the evolving narrative of the American Century.
An updated edition of Andrew J. Bacevich's valuable examination of the dangerous obsession that has taken hold of Americans: a marriage of militarism and blind utopian ideology, of unprecedented military might and a blind faith in the universality of American values.
A renowned historian and writer dismantles foreign policy decisions of the Trump and Biden administration.
Bacevich reconsiders the assumptions and purposes governing the exercise of American global power. Examining the presidencies of George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton-as well as George W. Bush's first year in office-he demolishes the view that the United States has failed to devise a replacement for containment as a basis for foreign policy.
The purpose of U.S. foreign policy has, at least theoretically, been to keep Americans safe. As we confront a radically changed world, it has become indisputably clear that the terms of that policy have failed. Washington's insistence that a market economy is compatible with the common good, its faith in the idea of the "West" and its "special relationships," its conviction that global military primacy is the key to a stable and sustainable world order-- these have brought endless wars and a succession of moral and material disasters. Bacevich lays down a new approach, based on moral pragmatism, mutual coexistence, and war as a last resort. His vision calls for nothing less than a profound overhaul of our understanding of national security. -- adapted from back cover.