"Explores the strands of the often unexpected intertwining of science, technology and society. Uncertainty arises from an oversupply of knowledge. The quest for innovation is society's response to the uncertainties that come with scientific and technological achievement." - cover.
One of the most persistent concerns about the future is whether it will be dominated by the predictive algorithms of AI – and, if so, what this will mean for our behaviour, for our institutions and for what it means to be human. AI changes our experience of time and the future and challenges our identities, yet we are blinded by its efficiency and fail to understand how it affects us. At the heart of our trust in AI lies a paradox: we leverage AI to increase control over the future and uncertainty, while at the same time the performativity of AI, the power it has to make us act in the ways it predicts, reduces our agency over the future. This happens when we forget that that we humans have created the digital technologies to which we attribute agency. These developments also challenge the narrative of progress, which played such a central role in modernity and is based on the hubris of total control. We are now moving into an era where this control is limited as AI monitors our actions, posing the threat of surveillance, but also offering the opportunity to reappropriate control and transform it into care. As we try to adjust to a world in which algorithms, robots and avatars play an ever-increasing role, we need to understand better the limitations of AI and how their predictions affect our agency, while at the same time having the courage to embrace the uncertainty of the future.
A A sequel to the authors previous widely acclaimed work on science,
technology and society A Develops a highly original account of the changing
notions of science and scientific knowledge A A well, written accessible text
that makes good use of illustrative examples A The authors are leading
scholars in the field. schovat popis
(3) The classical system-environment model, according to which the adaptation of a system to its environment is controlled externally and according to which the adaptation of the system occurs in the course of a learning process, is replaced by a model of systemic closure.
Uncertainty is interwoven into human existence. It is a powerful incentive in
the search for knowledge and an inherent component of scientific research. We
have developed many ways of coping with uncertainty. We make promises, manage
risks and make predictions to try to clear the mists and predict ahead.
An Orderly Mess is a timely diagnosis of the current dissolution of the modern
order, while highlighting the opportunities of messiness. The essay focuses on
the temporal and spatial dimensions in which messiness becomes apparent today:
broken time lines and fragmented spaces.
Science has development from a self-evident public good to being highly valued in other contexts for different reasons: strengthening the economic competitiveness and, especially in high-tech fields, as a financial investment for future gains. This has been accompanied by a shift from public to private funding with intellectual property rights gaining importance. But in contemporary democracies citizens have also begun to voice their concerns about science and technology related risks, demanding greater participation in decision-making and in the setting of research priorities. The book examines the legal issues and responses vis-à-vis these transformations of the nature of public science. It discusses their normative content as well as the inherent limitations of the law in meeting these challenges.
Helga Nowotny ist Vize-Präsidentin des Europäischen Forschungsrates und Professor emeritus der ETH Zürich. Sie gilt als die ›grande dame‹ der Wissenschaftsforschung in Europa.