The present volume is targeted at an interdisciplinary audience, i. e. partly at literary scholars/narratologists interested in time theory outside their field, and partly at scholars outside literary studies who in turn would like to learn more about such concepts created in narrative theory. The anthology assembles both English-speaking and German contributions to a narrative theory of time constructs which have thus far not been translated into English, but have – directly or indirectly – inspired the theoretical discourse across disciplines. The common methodological focus of the articles assembled here concerns the way in which the experience of chronological structure and ordering in (experienced or imagined) phenomena can be traced back to a logic of time “constructs”. Narrative time constructs – that is: models of chronological ordering which we generate while processing narratively encoded information – constitute a particularly rich body of examples. How we experience time is directly linked to how we narrate information, and how we re-construct principles of temporal ordering in the narrated content. The logic of narrative time constructs has therefore been of interest not only to narrative theory, but also to philosophy and cognitive science, and more recently to computational approaches toward modelling human time experience.
Jan Christoph Meister Boeken



Focusing on the concept of the episode as the smallest unit of narrative action, the work defines it as a construct formed by the reader, who interprets a series of distinct events as a transformational sequence of two occurrences. This interpretation relies on the text itself, the reader's world knowledge, and specific logical and semiotic rules that act as universal principles of narrative comprehension. Additionally, the study introduces a newly developed software application designed for identifying, tagging, and analyzing events within narrative texts.
Gustav Meyrinks Oeuvre ist bislang entweder unter die Kategorie «Phantastische Literatur» oder aber die Kategorie «Okkultisches Traktat» eingeordnet worden, was seine offenkundige Uneinheitlichkeit spiegelt. Allein die sinnfälligen inhaltlichen Bezüge zwischen Phantastik und Okkultismus sowie Meyrinks Biographie schienen die deutliche Wendung ins Traktathafte verständlich zu machen, die das Werk um 1915 erfuhr. In Abgrenzung zu bisherigen Deutungen versucht die vorliegende Studie, eine das gesamte Oeuvre als Tiefenstruktur prägende Logik nachzuweisen - die hypostasierende Logik mythischen Denkens.