Bookbot

Logical Studies of Paraconsistent Reasoning in Science and Mathematics

Parameters

  • 228bladzijden
  • 8 uur lezen

Meer over het boek

This volume features contributions from leading scholars across various schools within the research area of paraconsistency. The authors critically examine how contemporary paraconsistent logics can enhance our understanding of human reasoning in science and mathematics. They explore whether these logics can serve as the foundation for inconsistent yet valuable scientific and mathematical theories. The diversity of paraconsistent logics raises interrelated questions, including the desiderata a paraconsistent logic should fulfill, the potential for a universal approach to paraconsistent reasoning with axiomatic theories, and the structural similarities between reasoning about sets and truth. Additionally, the authors discuss the status of paraconsistent logic as a normative or descriptive discipline and identify which inconsistent but non-trivial axiomatic theories are best understood through various paraconsistent approaches. This work aims to provide a representative overview of the current philosophical debate on paraconsistency, generate innovative ideas for its future, and strengthen the philosophical foundation of paraconsistent logic by considering developments across different schools.

Uitgave

Een boek kopen

Logical Studies of Paraconsistent Reasoning in Science and Mathematics, Holger Andreas

Taal
Jaar van publicatie
2018
product-detail.submit-box.info.binding
(Paperback)
Zodra we het ontdekt hebben, sturen we een e-mail.

Betaalmethoden

Nog niemand heeft beoordeeld.Tarief

Taal
Engels
Uitgever
Springer
Jaar van publicatie
2018
Formaat
Paperback
Aantal pagina's
228
ISBN10
3319820567
ISBN13
9783319820569
Reeks
Aantekening
This volume features contributions from leading scholars across various schools within the research area of paraconsistency. The authors critically examine how contemporary paraconsistent logics can enhance our understanding of human reasoning in science and mathematics. They explore whether these logics can serve as the foundation for inconsistent yet valuable scientific and mathematical theories. The diversity of paraconsistent logics raises interrelated questions, including the desiderata a paraconsistent logic should fulfill, the potential for a universal approach to paraconsistent reasoning with axiomatic theories, and the structural similarities between reasoning about sets and truth. Additionally, the authors discuss the status of paraconsistent logic as a normative or descriptive discipline and identify which inconsistent but non-trivial axiomatic theories are best understood through various paraconsistent approaches. This work aims to provide a representative overview of the current philosophical debate on paraconsistency, generate innovative ideas for its future, and strengthen the philosophical foundation of paraconsistent logic by considering developments across different schools.